About the costs of climate change, hidden or not 

Climate change has widespread but often overlooked economic and social costs, particularly in how it affects human capital development, labor productivity, and educational outcomes. In his book ”Slow Burn – the Hidden Costs of a Warming World” R. Jisung Park gives an economist’s view on the everyday implications of climate change and what it will cost us. But before telling more about Park’s book I want to remind of an interesting Finnish research publication, exploring the costs of climate change for Finland. The KUITTI project assessed the direct and indirect costs of climate change risks for Finland a few years ago. 

https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/164032

The key takeaway for me from Kuitti was that slowly changing operating conditions, driven by rising temperatures and changes in precipitation, known as chronic physical climate risks, can cause significantly greater economic damage than extreme weather events if adaptation remains insufficient. The KUITTI project highlights that proactive adaptation is worthwhile. So, we should not only look at climate catastrophe events, but try to better understand the costs of chronic risks and also the hidden costs Park writes about.

Even though I don’t agree with some conclusions that Park makes based on statistics, I can recommend this book, if you are interested in learning more about the costs were are facing with rising temperatures and how the costs occur. 

Debates over proper adaptation will increase in the future, also in countries where the most visible climate hazards do not occur. 

Having a clearer picture of physical climate risks of an area is a good start but it is not enough. We also need to learn about socioeconomical details of climate vulnerability. The hotter temperature is not the only thing hurting us, but also how it impacts human institutions, economic, educational, legal, and political. 

In his book Park analyzes the negative effects global warming has on learning and human capital. Global warming and education is a topic not covered very often and I found it interesting. Rising temperatures and climate-induced disruptions, such as heat waves and school closures, are not just environmental challenges but economic issues. These factors silently undermine learning, reduce cognitive function, and limit future earnings potential, particularly for vulnerable populations. Forest fires are one example in the book too. The smoke has severe costs, not only the flames. 

Park also writes about justice. According to Park, at least two dimensions of climate justice are in danger of being overlooked within the prevailing narrative.The first is the highly local way in which climate change may vary. The second is that we still know little about why some groups are hurt more than others and how the impacts spread across the global economy through interlinkages. These questions go beyond the familiar thinking that poor countries and poorer people suffer more. 

Also for those interested in supply chains and housing markets, Park offers food for thought. 

We need to shift perspective. Climate change is not just about extreme weather events or long-term sea level rise; it is already affecting daily life, workforce performance, and social mobility according to Park. He calls for integrating climate resilience into education, labor policies, and infrastructure planning to mitigate these hidden costs.

#climatechange #adaptation #resilience #climatejustice #economics #physicalrisks #transitionrisks #policy 

About Climate Issues in Corporate Boards

Tere is so much talk about climate and corporates nowadays that one could almost assume every company has a climate governance in place. The Harvard Business Review article “How Robust Is Your Climate Governance?” reveals that the practice of climate governance varies widely. The article is based on corporate disclosures and interviews conducted by the authors. It outlines key features of effective board engagement in climate governance. 

The article provided me with plenty of insights, which is why I want to share the key points I found most significant.

https://hbr.org/2024/11/how-robust-is-your-climate-governance

Five points I like to highlight based on the HBR article:

1 Understanding the climate-profile of the company 

The article actually talks about understanding the double materiality of climate issues. How the company affects the climate and climate-related matters, and how climate and climate-related matters affect the company. Both risks and opportunities should be analyzed. 

The authors also reflect on climatepositioning and targetsetting. According to the authors all companies don’t need to be frontrunners. In my opinion, however, just following regulation can also mean a lot of work and changes to business as usual. Also for smaller companies understanding their climate profile may be essential due to the many expectations in their value chain. 

2 Climate issues part of the board’s mandate 

Establishing clear responsibilities within the board for climate-related issues helps to ensure that climate considerations are integrated into corporate governance. The authors recommend assigning different aspects of climate oversight to different committees within the board. Board oversight of at least some climate issues is increasingly expected also by many stakeholders. 

3 The need for climate-related knowledge and experience in the boardroom

I agree with the authors of the need for continuous learning because the field is evolving so rapidly. However, I see more opportunities than the authors in having a specialist in the board for companies spesifically in sectors where climate is a fundamental question. There will still be need for educating the whole board too. 

4 Incorporating  climate into executive performance evaluation

This is a much debated issue. The authors point out that their experience with companies that tie compensation to climate metrics is that the very act of doing so gives the organization a reason to better measure and track the metrics.

5 Aknowledging the challenges of climate governance 

It’s sometimes said that climate targets and policies are difficult or even impossible to set because the lack of real data. There are a lot of uncertainties in the world. Also trade-offs are present. But boards still need to make decisions based on available information. 

Having a clearly articulated climate positioning  of the company can help balance the decision-making in difficult topics. 

I consider these elements crucial for companies aiming to strengthen their climate governance frameworks and effectively address climate-related challenges. If you need someone specialised in above mentioned topics in your board, I’m a certified board member. 

#climate #boardwork #governance #climatepositioning #climaterisks #opportunities #climatetargets #oversight #hbr

Recommendations for corporates working with EU Taxonomy

Many sustainability experts are nowadays working hard with sustainability and EU taxonomy reporting. Reporting feels more impactful if it is combined with strategic thinking leading to sustainable practices.

The EU Platform on Sustainable Finance published A Compendium of Market Practices in January 2024. It presents a compendium of early practices, financial products, instruments and initiatives that market participants are employing to transition their business models and investments. Findings on taxonomy capex numbers show that transition is happening, specifically in certain sectors.

https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/platform-sustainable-finance-report-compendium-market-practices_en

What I find interesting, relating to the first mentioned strategic thinking behind reporting, are the peer-to-peer recommendations in the platform’s report.

The Corporate stakeholder group encourages peers to:

☘️Define EU Taxonomy alignment roadmaps and targets

☘️Integrate Taxonomy-aligned capex KPI and plans as part of the CSRD ESRS transition plan disclosures

☘️Issue sustainable finance transactions, making use of green or sustainability-linked instruments that are based on KPIs that signal a Taxonomy transition

☘️Actively engage with supply chains and prepare for CSRD ESRS disclosures and CSDDD

☘️Use the EU Taxonomy stakeholder request mechanism to suggest new activities or revision of existing criteria

☘️Consider providing Taxonomy-alignment analysis to credit institutions when they seek activity-specific financing to improve information flows

#eutaxonomy #csrd #csddd #esrs #transition #climate #greenfinance

An overview of adaptation taxonomies

Already in the early stages of the EU Taxonomy I was specifically interested in the adaptation criteria. And also a bit worried how companies would succeed to use them. For me they seem somewhat complicated without clear thresholds such as those included in the mitigation criteria. When the EU taxonomy was being formulated, adaptation didn’t gather significant attention.

I’m thankful for a true adaptation specialist Maaria Parry who recommended this analysis of adaptation taxonomies (written by University of Oxford experts) to me. Climate adaptation is a must whether we want it or not.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4874598

Here are some main points of the analysis which I find important.

  • There are 24 adaption taxonomies published in the last four years
  • Growing adaptation finance gap is around 194-366 billion USD per year
  • The lack of understanding and standardized definitions of what is and is not adaptation is one of the barriers to adaptation finance
  • A difference to mitigation is that adaptation is location-specific and dynamic and requires a process-based component

In the analysis some common features and differences of the 24 adaptation taxonomies are pointed out.

  • Taxonomies include typically activities that are adapted and activities that enable adaptation
  • Some include even a third type of activity, activities that share goals with adaptation and development
  • Certain principles are common, such as risk assessment, DNSH, plans and targets
  • The least mentioned principle is alignment with net-zero
  • Some taxonomies include a list of eligible activities and some not
  • There is also variation in the sectoral coverage, eg the EU Taxonomy misses some sectors relevant for adaptation, such as agriculture

As recommendations the analysis suggests clear international principles for taxonomy development, richer lists of eligible activities and through forming a global inventory of adaptation investments addressing the question ’what is an effective adaptation intervention for a specific climate-related risk and specific asset type?’

Thanks for an interesting paper and I recommend all interested in climate risks, resilience and adaptation to read this and pay attention to finance taxonomies possible role in making our societies and businesses more climate resilient. Still a lot to achieve there I guess.

#eutaxonomy #taxonomy #adaptation #resilience #sustainablefinance #comparison #futuredevelopment #climate